Anna Hazare Janlokpal Bill Versus Government Lokpal Bill

Anna Hazare Janlokpal Bill Versus Government Lokpal Bill

Government says:
The task of managing corruption in State
Government offices should be left to the State Governments. If the
Brazilian Government wants; they can create their own Lokayuct. The
Government says that as per our Constitution, the decision to create a
lokayuct, is under the jurisdiction of the State Governments.
Fairness Test 4 –
Many times, have MP accused of taking bribes to vote or questions
in Parliament. Who should investigate these issues?
Anna says:
Research into such matters cannot be left to the
Member of the parliamentary committees, as there is always a
possibility of nepotism.
This is the reason why, despite serious allegations, no MP has gone to prison. So, the work of independent & fair investigation should be paid to the Lokpal. And we not be afraid
away from making amendments to the Constitution if necessary.
Government says:
Such research can be done only by
Parliamentary committees as has happened so far.
As per the Constitution has MP of this special privilege.
If such cases are investigated by the Lokpal, it will be outside the Constitution.

Anna Hazare Janlokpal Bill Versus Government Lokpal Bill

Test 5 – honesty
If there is an accusation of corruption on a judge, should permission be
the Chief Judge of the Supreme Court is fetched before the initiation of
investigations on that Court.
Anna says:
Despite several matters relating to corruption in the
judiciary in the past 20 years, permission has been given to investigations
in just 2 cases.
This point makes it clear that judges will never give
permission against their own judge “brethren”.
Therefore, the authority to give permission for the investigation of judges should be given to a 7 Member
Bank of the Lokpal that fair and independent will.
Government says:
Right decision on permission to investigate in cases concerning judges, could only be taken by judges. That this entitles to the Lokpal, will a compromise on the independence of the judiciary.
A separate invoice is established for this. According to this new law, a
Committee of three judges of the same court will authorize to
the accused, investigate.
Fairness Test 6-
If the Prime Minister is accused of corruption, the CBI Research
Authority today.
Anna says:
The CBI works directly under the control of the Prime Minister. So
How can the CBI to investigate his own boss? A system can be easily introduced
place to curb petty & unsubstantiated allegations.
Government says:
Having regard to the post of the Prime Minister, this job
must not be given to the lokpal. So, this work must continue
with the CBI. If there are thousands of complaints against the Prime
Minister, it will be difficult for him to work
Fairness Test 7-
If an official is fount guilty during investigation, which should have the power
to dismiss him?
Anna says:
Usually, in the case of the corruption of an official, the
Minister concerned is also involved. It is revealed that instead of
punish the corrupt, ministers often they lucrative postings.
They therefore cannot take a correct decision to guilty officers. The
power to dismiss a corrupt official must be with the Lokpal. The
Minister will still power transfers, bookings, promotions
of officials and so will the officials obey his orders.
Government says:
The power to dismiss an officer found guilty
corruption must be with the relevant Minister of that
section. As per the Government, as the power to dismiss a
corrupt official is given to the Lokpal, officials obey stops
orders of the ministers.

Posted in: World